Home Editorial WhichPLM: PLM Supplier Evaluations

WhichPLM: PLM Supplier Evaluations

0
0

evaluation-header

Here at WhichPLM we pride ourselves in being impartial. Since our inception we have remained unbiased and informative. Our passion is to educate, and not to coerce; to report, and not to influence.

We post the most up-to-date articles from a host of contributors – brands, vendors and advisors alike. And not only do we report exclusively upon industry events, but we also report upon suppliers. We are often approached by software vendors eager for a thorough evaluation of their system, and on the other side of the coin, by prospective PLM customers eager to obtain exclusive reviews of these very vendors. Knowing the maturity of a supplier’s solution is just as important for a prospective customer as for the suppliers themselves.

Our ethical stance shapes the processes we use to evaluate suppliers. A WhichPLM Supplier Evaluation is unlike any other vendor profile, benchmark or review. Our research methods are exhaustive and truly expert, and our conclusions independent, unbiased, and informed by 30 years of hands-on PDM, CPM & PLM experience.

When a software supplier approaches WhichPLM looking to have their solution benchmarked, we first explain that our methods go beyond technical evaluation. Although we do benchmark the solution in question (based on our own hands-on experience of PLM from its inception to modern-day solutions) we also take a more holistic view of the vendor themselves, seeking to understand their ethos, competencies, industry knowledge, customer insights, services and support capabilities, geographical presence, international solution offering and business sustainability.

This extension of what might typically be a purely technical evaluation is done for several reasons. Firstly, increasingly educated customers are becoming more able to assess core PLM functionality for themselves, based on education gleaned from WhichPLM and other such sources.

Secondly, we recognise that choosing a PLM supplier involves choosing a long-term partner on the basis of more than just software. At WhichPLM we like to think of our research covering the “3 Ps”: Product, Process & People.

Having evaluated a number of vendors already, WhichPLM, in conjunction with these vendors, is now proud to publish our results. Each evaluation will be made available via downloadable PDF. To download your copy/copies simply click the button(s) below. Alternatively, you can click the evaluation badge on any (evaluated vendor’s) company page. To find out which suppliers have been evaluated so far, please visit our PLM Listings. Suppliers without a current evaluation can be found towards the bottom of the listings.

slider-cgs

slider-dassault

slider-gerber

slider-lectra

slider-visual

If you are a software supplier interested in undergoing a professional and expert evaluation by the WhichPLM team, who has the two C’s – confidence and conviction – in their software please get in touch with a member of the WhichPLM team.

And if you are a retailer, brand or manufacturer asking why these evaluations are so important, click here

Lydia Hanson Lydia Hanson has been part of the WhichPLM team for over four years now. She has a creative and media background, and is responsible for maintaining and updating our website content, liaising with advertisers, working on special projects like the Annual Review, and more. Joining mid-2013 as our Online Editor, she has since become WhichPLM’s Editor. In addition to taking on writing and interviewing responsibilities, Lydia has also become the primary point of contact for news, events, features and other aspects of our ever-growing online content library and tools.